When Will the Acer Predator 17 Gtx 1070 Be on Sale Again
Acer Predator 17 G9-793 Notebook Review
The Mighty Giant. Just this May, we reviewed the Predator 17 G9-792 with GTX 980M GPU. Now Acer has released the nearly identical successor, this time equipped with a GTX 1070 graphics carte. The behemoth manages to impress once again with special features like an additional FrostCore cooling fan. Is the Predator "cooler" than its competition?
The Predator 17 G9-793 is Acer's third iteration of the high-stop 17-inch gaming series. The beginning version - the Predator 17G9-791 - had a few weaknesses, which Acer successfully addressed with the successor G9-792: the Turbo utilization was improved, the racket level reduced. Some points of criticism remained, all the same: the chassis was still humongous, the GPU notwithstanding throttled nether extreme loads and accessibility to the hardware was still restricted.
The predecessor was available in many different configurations, which is likewise true for the newest offering. Like most of the 17-inch Predators, the G9-793-77LG incorporates an Intel Skylake quad-core Core i7-6700HQ - in our instance, this CPU has access to 32 GB of RAM. In improver, the gaming rig comes with a GeForce GTX 1070 graphics card with 8 GB of GDDR5-VRAM. Our review sample has a 4K IPS brandish with a resolution of 3840 10 2160 pixels. A positive attribute is the generous selection of physical ports, which includes a Thunderbolt 3 port using a USB 3.ane Type C interface. A Killer WLAN module, a gaming-specific, colorful backlit keyboard with programmable function keys and many useful tools - similar the well-known Dust Defender - round out the package. Our review notebook is a pre-production model, so some quirks are more likely. Most issues normally become addressed though before the official release.
Here's a listing of the nearly significant differences between the 793 and the 792:
- GTX 1070 instead of the GTX 980M or GTX 970M.
- M-Sync likewise works with the integrated panel.
- The chassis is slightly different (exhaust grill at the rear).
- The power adapter now supplies 230 watts instead of 180 watts, which ways that the battery now doesn't discharge with the notebook plugged in.
For our comparing, we decided on two other 17-inch notebooks with GeForce GTX 1070 and two other, also still fairly up-to-date high-end notebooks with GTX 980M and GTX 980, respectively:
- Asus ROG G752VS
- MSI GTT72VR 6RE
- Alienware 17 R3
- Schenker XMG U716
Working For Notebookcheck
Are y'all a techie who knows how to write? And so join our Team!
Wanted: High german-English language-Translator (English native speakers preferred)
Details here
Memory
32768 MB
, 2x 16 GB DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, 2 of four slots occupied, max. 64 GB
Display
17.30 inch 16:ix, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 4K / UHD, 1000-Sync, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Storage
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, 256 GB
, SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. Slots: 1x one thousand.2 Typ 2280 & 1x 2.five-inch
Weight
four.23 kg ( = 149.21 oz / nine.33 pounds), Power Supply: 930 g ( = 32.8 oz / two.05 pounds)
Notation: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Survey
Join our Support Satisfaction Survey 2022: We want to hear about your experiences!
Participate here
Every bit we mentioned earlier, the chassis is very like to that of the predecessors. The just visible departure are the fan grills, which look a niggling more "playful" this time around. For our comparison, we'll reference the review of the G9-791.
The weight of the chassis - noted as one of the negative aspects before - has increased fifty-fifty more and the G9-793 now tips our scale at 4.23 kg. The substantial depth of the notebook hasn't inverse, either. While other manufacturers still go along an eye on the mobility aspect, Acer seems to ignore information technology completely. Since high-terminate notebooks larger than 15 inches are really to large for frequent traveling and oftentimes offering much less performance while running on battery power anyway, nosotros tin merely applaud Acer's decision. The Predator belongs on a desk and the structure confirms it.
Manufactures of role and business concern notebooks rely on more than or less compatible construction with few visual highlights. Acer goes a different road and no thing where the eye falls, it encounters cerise accents galore: there are red illuminated decorating strips which flank the Predator-logo on the lid and the extravagant, triangular power button above the keyboard. All ventilation grills as well as the speaker grills are either red or characteristic cherry-red borders. The edgy and futuristic blueprint likely appeals to youthful men, but might also be besides obtrusive for some. The colorful keys contribute here as well.
The predecessor'south chassis left us with a positive impression and the new version isn't any different. The construction quality of the base unit is without mistake; the notebook is very solid and doesn't yield even when fairly substantial pressure is applied in the centre of the keyboard. Every bit before, the brandish chapeau isn't very stiff and emits some creaking sounds when twisted. The hinges a very strong, and then display bouncing is minimized even when the notebook is jostled effectually. Information technology'southward withal easy to open up the lid with one paw, however. The rubberized surfaces offering a lot of grip, merely are susceptible to fingerprints, which are not like shooting fish in a barrel to make clean off, either.
Acer Predator 17 G9-793
Acer Predator 17 G9-793
Acer Predator 17 G9-793
Acer Predator 17 G9-793
Acer Predator 17 G9-793
Acer Predator 17 G9-793
Acer Predator 17 G9-793
Acer Predator 17 G9-793
Acer Predator 17 G9-793
Acer Predator 17 G9-793
The width, the meridian and the weight of four.2 kg are really not that unusual for a gaming notebook, merely the depth - at 322 mm - certainly is. TheAsus G752VS, however, is wider, deeper, thicker, and heavier past about 300 yard. All other competitors counterbalance less and three cm less deep.
❌
At that place isn't much to report well-nigh the physical ports and their distribution. We don't have whatsoever reasons to complain: in addition to the 4x USB 3.0, the Acer comes with a USB Type-C connector supporting a full-fledged Thunderbolt 3 interface - which means that DisplayPort for USB 3.ane Gen2 is supported every bit well. Adapters of course have to exist purchased separately. External monitors tin can as well be hooked upwards via HDMI and DisplayPort. Cabled Gigabit LAN is of course essential for a gaming notebook and thus on board as well. Nosotros should also mention the traditional and separated audio ports. We can't find whatsoever faults with the position of the ports, either, as they are all located towards the rear of the notebook and on the sides, which is ideal.
Equally the diagram below shows, the carte reader transfers data at medium-fast rates of seventy to xc MB/s. Even the faster (up to two times the transfer speed) Schenker XMG U716 and the MSI GT72VR don't quite attain the total potential of our Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-Ii reference SD bill of fare, still.
Wireless connectivity is provided past the WLAN module Killer Wireless-Air conditioning 1535, which was specifically designed for gaming notebooks. The module tin either use the - often times overly crowded - 2.4 GHz or the less-utilized 5 GHz band forth with the faster ac standard. Since the use of 2 antennas are supported (MIMO 2x2), the theoretical information throughput rate is 867 MBit/southward. The Killer Network Manager (screenshot farther down beneath) software allows the user to tweak the settings. The manufacturer lists specific features and characteristics of the module here .
One meter away from the router, the Acer notebook merely averaged 322 MBit/s when receiving data. The Asus G752VS with Intel Wireless-AC 8260 (ac, MIMO 2x2) is up to 76 % faster. We don't quite know what's going on here: the Acer transmits at 528 MBit/s, which outperforms the aforementioned Asus.Information technology'due south possible that a commuter update will remedy this outcome (if we tin can fifty-fifty call it an issue) down the line.
Aside from the usual accessories (like the ability adapter, at present rated at 230 watts vs. 180 watts, the quickstart guide, and the warranty information), the box too contains an boosted FrostCore fan, which can exist inserted into the slot for the optical bulldoze (also included) and is supposed to provide additional cooling.
Accessibility is not the Acer's strong suite - even though this is a gaming notebook. The maintenance cover on the lesser is like shooting fish in a barrel plenty to remove (two screws), but only the two.five-inch HDD, the Grand.two SSD, and the two empty RAM slots are attainable. Getting to the fan and the other components requires complete disassembly.
In Germany, the Predator is covered confronting defects for two years via a Pick-Upward & Return warranty. An additional International Travelers Warranty is provided for one twelvemonth.
Acer supplies various useful tools - the screenshots below show their purpose- and thankfully doesn't install any bloatware.
Keyboard
The keyboard appears to exist identical to those of the predecessors. The area left to the chiclet keyboard is home to six special role keys. Five of them form a special grouping and are assigned their own individual color. The P-key upwards top allows the user to switch the groups. As shipped, grouping 1 (cherry-red) is assigned as follows:Ever use discrete graphics, Disable sticky keys, Maximum fan speed, Multimedia Way Settings, and Game Bar. In addition to those functions, the keys tin exist used for macros as well. Only those keys that have functions assigned to them lite up.
Dissimilar Asus and MSI, Acer uses a full-sized dedicated number block. The but bachelor backlight colour for the number block is white, while the main keyboard has iii color zones, which are adjustable, only can't be dimmed. To brand locating the arrow keys easier, Acer moved them downward slightly. Only like the WASD keys, the arrow keys feature optical accents, so they stand out from the rest of the keys. The uppermost row with the Esc key and F keys (as well every bit the lettering) is unfortunately not full-sized. Because of the location of the arrow keys, Acer had to shorten the lesser row as well, so the Ctrl key isn't enlarged equally it unremarkably would be. Aside from that, everything is in the identify we would expect it.
The rubberized keys are flat, clearly legible and feature adequate - although non overly generous - spacing. In our opinion, the keys could be a flake stiffer, but we like the keystroke with limited dampening and the rigid keyboard deck. Since some of the larger keys clatter a bit, typing is what nosotros would call "medium loud".
Touchpad
Acer incorporates a classic touchpad with crimson perimeter illumination and physically separated mouse buttons. Like we mentioned in an early review, the touchpad is recessed as well far for our liking. The touch-sensitive surface is smooth and works well fifty-fifty when the fingers are slightly damp, although there'southward some stuttering when the fingers are very sweaty. The accuracy and the response are top-notch. Drag & drop via double-tapping worked flawlessly as well. Adjusting the gestures is only possible via the native Windows tools.
Acer decided on a matte IPS display with a resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K), although models with Full-Hd panel should be available downward the line. 8.3 one thousand thousand pixels (Full-Hard disk: two.1 1000000) on a 17.three-inch display lead to a - for a notebook - very high pixel density of 255 ppi. Even users with perfect vision will be hard-pressed to identify individual pixels. The sharpness of the screen is close to perfect. The pretty decent average effulgence of 320 cd/m 2 - more than sufficient for all indoor scenarios - sh ould also not hamper ergonomics should the user dare to venture outside. The competing notebooks are about as vivid as the Acer and do equally well here.
All notebooks characteristic brightness distributions of 88 - 90 %, then on paper at least there shouldn't be whatever bug. Subjectively, quite the opposite is true, as we haven't encountered a cloudy brandish such every bit the Acer's in a long fourth dimension. Particularly at the edges of the correct side, which mostly appears to be brighter, nosotros encountered massive screen bleeding. Since the flick changes significantly when the lid is twisted, we think that the panel might not have been integrated properly and is subjected to mechanical tension at all times.
| 318 cd/m² | 337 cd/m² | 302 cd/grand² | ||
| 343 cd/m² | 336 cd/m² | 325 cd/g² | ||
| 314 cd/yard² | 304 cd/m² | 303 cd/m² | ||
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B)
Ten-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 343 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 320.2 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/g²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 336 cd/m²
Dissimilarity: 1344:1 (Blackness: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Colour 3.61 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.78 | 0.64-98 Ø5.half-dozen
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.vi.3 3D)
88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.ii.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.92% Display P3 (Argyll 2.two.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160 | Asus G752VS-XB78K LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), 1920x1080 | MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080 | Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) CV69H_173WF4 (LGD0459), 1920x1080 | Schenker XMG U716 AU B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -25% | -23% | -26% | -0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 86.92 | 66.91 -23% | 68.29 -21% | 66.92 -23% | 86.46 -ane% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 85.21 -15% | 86.72 -xiii% | 83.91 -16% | 99.99 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.38 | 62.33 -37% | 63.43 -36% | 61.39 -38% | 99.04 0% |
| Response Times | 3% | 1% | eight% | -20% | |
| Response Time Gray l% / Gray 80% * | 37 ? | 38 ? -3% | 34.4 ? vii% | 33 ? 11% | 45 ? -22% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 22 ? 8% | 25.2 ? -5% | 23 ? 4% | 28 ? -17% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | -10% | -10% | -24% | -11% | |
| Brightness centre | 336 | 328 -2% | 348.seven iv% | 360 7% | 374 xi% |
| Effulgence | 320 | 317 -1% | 327 2% | 336 5% | 356 eleven% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 89 1% | 90 2% | 88 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.three -20% | 0.323 -29% | 0.44 -76% | 0.iv -60% |
| Contrast | 1344 | 1093 -19% | 1080 -20% | 818 -39% | 935 -30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.61 | three.74 -four% | 4.09 -13% | iv.76 -32% | 4.23 -17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.02 | eight.97 -49% | ix.02 -50% | 10.8 -79% | 6.7 -11% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | four.78 | 2.67 44% | two.xiv 55% | iii.69 23% | 5.48 -15% |
| Gamma | two.32 95% | ii.41 91% | 2.25 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.35 94% |
| CCT | 6185 105% | 6861 95% | 6885 94% | 6091 107% | 6686 97% |
| Color Infinite (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88 | 56 -36% | 56.nine -35% | 55 -37% | 88 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 85 -15% | 86.five -13% | 84 -sixteen% | 100 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% / -xi% | -11% / -11% | -14% / -twenty% | -ten% / -ten% |
* ... smaller is amend
Because of the very noticeable screen bleeding, the display isn't uniformly black despite the decent black value of only0.25 cd/yard², which leads to an outstanding dissimilarity ratio of 1344:one. The competitors virtually fare equally well here with contrast ratios from 800:1 to 1100:1, withal.
The expert news continue with the - for (semi)professional photograph editors - important coverage of the color spaces. The G9-793 covers upwardly to 88 % of the large AdobeRGB color space; sRGB is covered at 100 %. Only theSchenker XMG U716 tin can keep upwardly here, since it features the same panel. The color accuracy is not quite as bang-up, as the DeltaE-values should exist under 3. As shipped, the display has a slight redish/chocolate-brown tint - simply a calibration takes care of that.
Thank you to the matte panel and high overall brightness, we were able to decipher the screen content fifty-fifty when nosotros deliberately oriented the display towards the sky (right photo). The left photo was taken with a forepart door behind the reviewer'south back. Direct sunlight is probably too much for the display though.
IPS brandish panels accept better viewing bending stability than their TN siblings, but there are of class differences inside the family likewise. Our review notebook allows for an nearly unlimited range of positions without significant moving-picture show deterioration. Even at very shallow angles, the colors don't modify and the losses in effulgence and contrast, which are unavoidable, are negligible.
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to modify from one colour to the adjacent. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can crusade moving objects to announced blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rising |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparing, all tested devices range from 0.viii (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response fourth dimension is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.half dozen ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Gray to 80% Gray | ||
| 37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will exist unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.711 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the boilerplate of all tested devices (37.3 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks volition simply wheel the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is likewise low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even find the flickering altogether.
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
| In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 22226 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Post-obit is a collection of organisation screenshots:
The Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Skylake, 2.6-3.5 GHz, Hyper-Threading, 45 Watt TDP) is an former acquaintance which we have encountered and talked about a dozen times before. Please visit our dedicated processor page here for more details. A quick synopsis: the CPU is fast enough for all commonly used applications. According to the Cinebench R15 (Multicore) examination, the Predator isn't one of the fastest notebooks with this 14 nm CPU, but nevertheless, the Alienware 17 R3 (besides equipped with the i7-6700HQ) is only about four % faster.
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
141 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
656 Points
Help
The results of the PCMark 8 criterion tests were erratic with the scores sometimes manner too low and changing from ane run to the next. Since nosotros tin can't rely on the scores, we will forgo an assay. Subjectively, the notebook ran smoothly with exceedingly quick load times even during heavy multitasking-sessions or when running demanding software titles.
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4060 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2303 points | |
| Help | ||
Ane reason for the peculiar PCMark 8 scores could be the inconsistent performance of the 256 GB Toshiba SSD during the CrystalDiskMark 3.0 criterion examination. According to the As SSD benchmark, which produces very uniform results, the NVMe Drive is capable of outstanding sequential read rates due north of 2000 MB/south, which is certainly appreciated when loading games or transferring large files. The throughput when reading smaller 4K files - important for the Os operation besides as programme starts - is also very good.
Sequential Read: 2016.06MB/southward
Sequential Write: 836.91MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.058ms
Admission Time Write: 0.038ms
TheGeForce GTX 1070 is a very high-end GPU from Nvidia's Pascal-serial of graphics bill of fare. At the fourth dimension of writing, only the (much more expensive) GTX 1080 is faster. In addition to the blazing fast chip itself, the card too features 8 GB of GDDR5 RAM, which are connected via 256-bit interface - so the GPU should be fairly future-proof every bit well. While the desktop version of the GPU features a somewhat higher clock speed, it simply has access to 1920 shaders - the notebook variant has 2048. According to GPU-Z, the base of operations clock speed is 1443 MHz. The Turbo can overclock to at least 1645 MHz if needed.
The results of the 3DMark 11 benchmark test show that the Predator 17 performs near as well as the other GTX 1070-equipped notebooks we've tested so far. The Acer is nigh 5 % slower than the Asus G752VS, merely Asus actually overclocks the GPU even farther. According to the Fire Strike portion of the newest 3DMark, the Predator 17 is slower by virtually 6 %, which can likely exist attributed to the way Acer manages the clock speeds. With the notebook running on bombardment ability, the 3DMark xi score dropped from 15153 to 7037 points.
| 3DMark eleven Operation | 15153 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24298 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12354 points | |
| Assistance | ||
Fifty-fifty enervating games at Full-Hard disk drive resolution with maximum settings and active MSAA are no trouble for the GPU. Nigh Triple-A titles even run stutter-gratuitous at the native 4K resolution with the settings on high - the previous-generation GTX 980M had no adventure hither. For our tests, we kept the factory setting with Cool Heave deactivated. A quick check with Cool Boost enabled didn't testify a noticeable improvement.
Our review notebook did have some problems with the Far Cry Primal benchmark: with the Ultra-preset (FHD) selected, the Predator trailed theAsus G752VS - equipped with a faster processor and a college-clocked GPU - by nearly 16 %. More critical for FPS games is the 4K resolution - here, the Acer was slower past simply almost 5 %. The Predator also trails theG752VS slightly when running Rise of the Tomb Raider, merely is alee when playing The Witcher 3.
| Far Cry Central | |
| 3840x2160 Loftier Preset AA:SM | |
| Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM | |
| Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| 1920x1080 Very Loftier Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
| MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) | |
| Anno 2205 | |
| 3840x2160 High Preset AA:4x | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Schenker XMG U716 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:8x | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Schenker XMG U716 | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 3840x2160 Loftier Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
| Schenker XMG U716 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
| Schenker XMG U716 | |
| Mirror's Border Goad | |
| 3840x2160 Loftier Preset AF:16x | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x | |
| MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Battlefield 4 | |
| 3840x2160 High Preset | |
| Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Schenker XMG U716 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS | |
| Asus G752VS-XB78K | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Schenker XMG U716 | |
| Star Wars Battlefront | |
| 3840x2160 Loftier Preset AA:FX | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Schenker XMG U716 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Schenker XMG U716 | |
To check the system noise, we selected the high performance contour with agile cooling enabled. Nosotros should too note that nosotros conducted the test at fairly high ambience temperatures during the Summer. The CPU cooling fan runs even during idle, but in an office equipped with a regular desktop PC, we could only hear the notebook when we got very close to information technology. Sometimes the fan spools up for no apparent reason and is at present audible from about i meter away. Fifty-fifty only opening a programme similar FurMark - without really running information technology - is enough to get the fan to spin upward. Most other notebooks do a amend chore handling those very curt spikes. Maybe a future BIOS/UEFI update can take care of the fan behavior at idle.
With both Prime95 and FurMark running in parallel (stress test), the GPU fan now spins as well. The RPMs increase rather apace, but smoothly until the notebook is audible immediately fifty-fifty upon entering the room. The sound is pretty brilliant and unfortunately accompanied by a loftier-pitched buzzing noise. Thanks to the editor's historic period, said buzzing wasn't really much of a problem, but younger users might find the audio obtrusive after a while. After running at maximum load for a while, the key to enable "Maximum fan speed" doesn't have any impact on the produced noise. The additional FrostCore fan doesn't appear to contribute much to the dissonance level at all.
Dissonance Level
| Idle | 33 / 34 / 40 dB(A) | |
| Load | 44 / 50 dB(A) | |
 | ||
| 30 dB forty dB(A) 50 dB(A) | ||
| min: | ||
, med: 
, max: 
Since a gaming notebook like the Acer won't be used on the lap, we really aren't that interested in the temperatures on the bottom of the unit of measurement. The eye area of the palm rest topped out at33.5 °C; the areas to the left and correct never exceeded 29 °C.
During the stress test with Prime95 and FurMark over extended periods of time, we observed CPU speeds from 2.6 to 3.one GHz, so throttling isn't an result. The CPU cores did reach98 °C every so often - fairly critical. The GPU topped out at75 °C at between 1200 and 1700 MHz (average: 1370 MHz), then low-cal throttling does occur at times.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 42.6 °C = 109 F Average: 36.7 °C = 98 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 44.9 °C = 113 F Average: 34.3 °C = 94 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ability Supply (max.) 45.9 °C = 115 F | Room Temperature 24 °C = 75 F | Voltcraft IR-900
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 33.one °C = 92 F Average: 29.5 °C = 85 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 28.9 °C = 84 F Average: 27.four °C = 81 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 30.4 °C = 87 F | Room Temperature 24 °C = 75 F | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The boilerplate temperature for the upper side nether maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F for the devices in the course Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of forty.2 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.six to 68.eight °C for the grade Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.ix °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.1 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the boilerplate temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.seven °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.5 °C / 92.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest surface area of like devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).
The sound organisation consists of four speakers and two subwoofers and is quite impressive. The maximum book level is high and sufficient even for large rooms. The Dolby Audio carte allows the user to select unlike presets and tweak various settings similar the equalizer. For our evaluation, we chose the standard setting. Music sounds pretty natural, full and detailed, but also slightly harsh - the upper frequency range appears to be slightly over-emphasized.
ThePredator 17 seems to handle lower frequencies better than most notebooks, although true bass is lacking (the enclosures are not big enough). The soundstage is pretty deep and the audio fairly dynamic, however. At maximum volume levels, the speakers distort at times; too many depression-frequency instruments at the same time muddle the sound somewhat. We didn't find whatever audio fluctuations during the review period. Since games sound decent, we don't recall that headphones are necessary. Overall, the sound system is very usable and the quality advisable for the high toll point.
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG audio assay
(+) | speakers tin can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - but iv% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs ii - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - but three.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (vii.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - sixteen.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (eleven.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, boilerplate was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» v% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average half-dozen.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (half dozen.iv% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - merely one.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (five.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs ii - 16 kHz
(±) | college highs - on average half dozen.vi% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.seven% difference to median)
Compared to aforementioned course
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were improve, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» x% of all tested devices were better, two% like, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of iii%, average was xx%, worst was 65%
Frequenzdiagramm im Vergleich (Checkboxen oben an/abwählbar!)
Wert 2: Pink Noise 100% Vol.; Wert 1: Sound aus
TheSchenker XMG U716, which is equipped with a desktop processor and GeForce GTX 980, has the highest power draw in our comparison. The Predator 17 is really more than comparable to theMSI GT72VR, since it features the same CPU/GPU combo and an SSD (although the display resolution is lower at 1920 x 1080 pixels). Noteworthy is the fact that the Acer consumes from 12 - 53 % more than in our three different idle-scenarios. Under load, the power depict is most as expected, only at maximum load levels, the Acer once again consumes more power (+9 %) than the MSI. The original ability adapter (180 watts) was not nearly powerful enough; the current power adapter supplies 230 watts, which is besides deadline, since the maximum ability draw reaches 223 watts.
During the practically relevant WLAN test with the display ready to medium, the Predator lasted merely 200 minutes - last in our comparison. Thanks to automated graphics switching, theAlienware 17 R3 – with a slightly weaker GPU and a marginally higher-capacity battery – lasted significantly longer and close down afterwards 7.5 hours. Mobile gaming of course means a significant reduction in functioning, but if the user should exist so inclined, we expect the notebook to final around ane.5 hours, similar to the competition.
Bombardment Runtime
| Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) | 4h 38min | |
| WiFi Websurfing | 3h 20min | |
| Load (maximum brightness) | 1h 29min |
Pros
+ bright and contrasty 4K panel with great color space coverage
+ Chiliad-Sync for the integrated display
+ future-proof RAM and VRAM configuration
+ highly adaptable lighting configuration
+ additional, replaceable fan (FrostCore)
+ usable tools (Dust Defender etc.)
+ USB three.1 Typ-C with Thunderbolt 3
+ thoughtful port distribution
+ good sound
+ good input devices
+ Makrotasten
Cons
- fan is a bit noisy and produces boosted sounds
- screen-bleeding quite pronounced
- GPU-throttling at maximum load levels
- big and bulky
- touchpad is recessed as well far
The screen bleeding we observed can possibly be attributed to the pre-production status of our review system (although we doubt information technology) - only we yet adjusted our exam score accordingly. More of an issue is the fact that the CPU of this particularly huge and heavy notebook reaches temperatures of98 °C and GPU throttling occurs equally well. Admittedly, our complaints are at a very high level. After all, the "engine" never quits even when playing highly demanding games with the settings maxed out. One remaining point of criticism: the G9-793 is withal quite hard to maintain.
Positive aspects are the very decent build quality, the great brandish, the very strong hardware, and the future-oriented selection of ports including Thunderbolt 3. The gaming-specific tools and the programmable keys are standouts besides. Last but not to the lowest degree, the very decent sound system is also worth mentioning.
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG - 2016-09-03 09/03/2016 v5.1(erstwhile)
Sven Kloevekorn
Gaming - Weighted Average
Pricecompare
Ended up in the IT sector in the 90s more or less accidentally and have remained in the industry (every bit a sysadmin) ever since. Always been interested in laptops - first purchase was - if memory serves correctly - a Toshiba Satellite T2115CS with DX4-75 processor, iv MB of RAM and 350 MB hard disk (and Windows 3.1). To this day, laptops appeal to me - much to the chagrin of my married woman, who doesn't seem understand why we demand 5-10 of them at any given time ;-).
Sven Kloevekorn, 2016-09-11 (Update: 2018-05-15)
Source: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Acer-Predator-17-G9-793-Notebook-Review.173668.0.html
0 Response to "When Will the Acer Predator 17 Gtx 1070 Be on Sale Again"
Post a Comment